Five cases are presented as standalone pages, each covering a distinct scenario: outdoor club, high-brightness indoor venue, commercial pop-up, operational fit-out and tournament training court.


Outdoor club reference — focus on weather resistance, slip resistance, drainage and color zoning.

High-brightness indoor court reference — focus on glare control, surface flatness, underfoot feel and presentation impact.

Commercial atrium and pop-up court reference — focus on rapid installation, relocatability and brand visibility.

Multi-court operational fit-out reference — focus on dividers, mobile net posts, storage and circulation efficiency.

Tournament and training court reference — focus on consistent ball response, net post dividers and complete turnkey delivery.
A case is not just "a few nice photos." A pickleball court project worth referencing should fully document five stages: Requirements — Material Selection — Construction — Inspection — Delivery. For each stage: what decisions were made, why each choice was made, and what verifiable deliverables resulted. The breakdown below helps you know what to look for as you review each case above, and how to map your own project against them.
The starting point for all material selection decisions. Translating "I want to build a court" into actionable engineering conditions prevents costly rework later.
| Parameter | Standard Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Playing area | 20×44 ft (6.10×13.41 m) | Excludes buffer zones and corridors — total area must be planned separately |
| Net height | Ends: 0.914 m / Center: 0.864 m | Center is slightly lower; verify with a post-installation measurement |
| Non-volley zone (kitchen) | 7 ft (2.13 m) from net | Symmetric on both sides; verify carefully during court marking |
| Line width | 2 inches | Lines are measured within the playing area; color must contrast with the surface |
Values above reflect common standard references. Always confirm against official / testing / formal quote documents for your specific project.
Once requirements are clear, material selection is the key to balancing value and playing experience. The three mainstream surface types each suit different scenarios — there is no absolute winner, only whether it matches your needs.
| Surface Type | Best Suited For | Reference Price (from) |
|---|---|---|
| Acrylic court coating (hard) | Existing hardened substrate, budget-sensitive projects, fast ball speed preferred | CNY 98/m2 (from) |
| Interlocking court tiles | Rapid installation needed, relocatable, indoor/outdoor versatility, cushioned underfoot feel | CNY 120-268/m2 |
| Elastic acrylic roll | Consistent ball response across the full court, tournament-grade presentation | CNY 200-260/m2 |
Reference prices are order-of-magnitude estimates only; final pricing is subject to official quote. Actual unit cost varies with area, substrate conditions, color choices and accessories. (Subject to official quote)
The same materials installed to a lower standard will produce a noticeably worse experience and shorter lifespan. For the construction stage, the key questions are: "Is the process followed correctly?" and "Are milestones documented?"
Acceptance is not a formality — it means systematically checking every item against the original requirements and standards. We recommend verifying across five dimensions: dimensions, surface, court markings, accessories and visual finish.
A complete delivery gives the owner both "a court ready to open immediately" and "a documentation package they can manage going forward." The checklist below is a general template you can use as a reference.
Specific deliverables are governed by the formal contract and quote agreement.
With the five stages in mind, reviewing the cases above becomes much more purposeful. We suggest the following approach:
Share your basic requirements and our engineers will contact you within 24 hours with a one-on-one court selection assessment and initial quote.